Rosetta Beta 6.00

Message boards : Number crunching : Rosetta Beta 6.00

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6

AuthorMessage
Sid Celery

Send message
Joined: 11 Feb 08
Posts: 2003
Credit: 39,124,557
RAC: 23,945
Message 108782 - Posted: 26 Dec 2023, 22:08:48 UTC - in response to Message 108781.  

I don't know what your settings are but I'm getting nearly 100% valid tasks here on my both Windows and Linux pc;s.
Me too. Send more betas.

Some Robetta tasks - non-Beta - sneaking through atm.
Hardly any tbh, but not quite nothing
ID: 108782 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sid Celery

Send message
Joined: 11 Feb 08
Posts: 2003
Credit: 39,124,557
RAC: 23,945
Message 108783 - Posted: 27 Dec 2023, 15:52:25 UTC - in response to Message 108782.  

I don't know what your settings are but I'm getting nearly 100% valid tasks here on my both Windows and Linux pc;s.
Me too. Send more betas.

Some Robetta tasks - non-Beta - sneaking through atm.
Hardly any tbh, but not quite nothing

Sneaking a few new8v Beta tasks now but similarly hard to come by
ID: 108783 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 1887
Credit: 8,446,776
RAC: 10,975
Message 108840 - Posted: 12 Feb 2024, 15:58:36 UTC - in response to Message 108755.  

I think that the 6.xx branch of code makes the same things as the 4.xx plus other things.
But it's in beta since the beginning of April.
Why not abandon the 4.xx branch (that has over 3 years old code)?


Still
ID: 108840 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Grant (SSSF)

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 20
Posts: 1509
Credit: 15,239,582
RAC: 23,302
Message 108957 - Posted: 9 Mar 2024, 11:13:06 UTC
Last modified: 9 Mar 2024, 11:15:03 UTC

Current batch of Beta tasks have the same naming convention as Rosetta 4.20, and use a similar amount of RAM.
Roughly 1.2GB of RAM required per Task.


Also running for around 8 hours, not the previous Task runtime of around 3hrs.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 108957 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 1887
Credit: 8,446,776
RAC: 10,975
Message 108964 - Posted: 9 Mar 2024, 17:49:48 UTC - in response to Message 108957.  

Current batch of Beta tasks have the same naming convention as Rosetta 4.20, and use a similar amount of RAM.


And seems there are problems with the graphic...
ID: 108964 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 1887
Credit: 8,446,776
RAC: 10,975
Message 108999 - Posted: 16 Mar 2024, 7:52:01 UTC

Some errors 1552811222, 1552784491, etc

ERROR: Error in protocols::cyclic_peptide_predict::SimpleCycpepPredictpplication::set_up_n_to_c_cyclization_mover() function: residue 1 does not have a LOWER_CONNECT.
ERROR:: Exit from: src/protocols/cyclic_peptide_predict/SimpleCycpepPredictApplication.cc line: 2442
BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out
08:36:42 (5544): called boinc_finish(1)

ID: 108999 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Grant (SSSF)

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 20
Posts: 1509
Credit: 15,239,582
RAC: 23,302
Message 109002 - Posted: 16 Mar 2024, 10:49:43 UTC

Yep, another group of faulty Tasks in with the current batch.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 109002 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 1887
Credit: 8,446,776
RAC: 10,975
Message 109020 - Posted: 21 Mar 2024, 6:17:29 UTC - in response to Message 109002.  
Last modified: 21 Mar 2024, 6:17:56 UTC

Yep, another group of faulty Tasks in with the current batch.


Today a lot of wus with this error:
residue 1 does not have a LOWER_CONNECT

ID: 109020 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Grant (SSSF)

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 20
Posts: 1509
Credit: 15,239,582
RAC: 23,302
Message 109021 - Posted: 21 Mar 2024, 6:31:20 UTC - in response to Message 109020.  

New batch, same problem.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 109021 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 1887
Credit: 8,446,776
RAC: 10,975
Message 109022 - Posted: 21 Mar 2024, 13:39:02 UTC - in response to Message 109021.  
Last modified: 21 Mar 2024, 13:40:40 UTC

New batch, same problem.


A little debug from admins is welcome.
ID: 109022 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 1887
Credit: 8,446,776
RAC: 10,975
Message 109231 - Posted: 5 May 2024, 19:27:09 UTC - in response to Message 108999.  

ERROR: Error in protocols::cyclic_peptide_predict::SimpleCycpepPredictpplication::set_up_n_to_c_cyclization_mover() function: residue 1 does not have a LOWER_CONNECT.
ERROR:: Exit from: src/protocols/cyclic_peptide_predict/SimpleCycpepPredictApplication.cc line: 2442
BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out
08:36:42 (5544): called boinc_finish(1)


Still the same error.
After 2 months. Seems there is no debug of errors...
ID: 109231 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mad_Max

Send message
Joined: 31 Dec 09
Posts: 208
Credit: 23,742,445
RAC: 14,863
Message 109245 - Posted: 13 May 2024, 4:44:13 UTC
Last modified: 13 May 2024, 5:03:08 UTC

A bug report (in the unlikely event that one of the developers still read forum and decides to fix some of the bugs).

On one of my computers (this one: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/results.php?hostid=1211592) ALL, without exception, tasks for the Rosetta Beta 6.xx application end with an error at the 1st minute of operation.
The error is always the same:
Unhandled Exception Detected...

- Unhandled Exception Record -
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address ........... (address vary)

This is a fairly old, but still decent and stable computer running on an AMD Phenom II X6 processor (6 physical cores) and 16 GB of RAM

Tasks for Rosetta 4.x are performed on it without any problems (except for faulty tasks that cause errors on all computers like famous "CHI angle" or "residue LOWERCONNECT" errors) as well as many(thousands - literally) tasks for several other DC projects: Einstein@Home, World Community Grid, SiDock@Home.

This has been going on for several months by now (starting from Rosetta beta version 6.03, I think, because I've seen some valid WUs with early versions from the 6.x branch on this computer), killing many hundreds of WUs.
During this time, there were several computer reboots and I reset the project twice (this includes re-downloading of all executable files and data files).
Without changes.

I do not think that the problem is in the software configuration, because on other computers I have not just a similar, but almost identical setup (originally obtained by cloning the system disk from this one).
The main difference is that other computers have newer processors installed - also from AMD but from newer generations - Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen 5 5600X on which the Rosetta 6.xx application works without problems with same SW setup.

So one of the versions of the error causes is that the application is trying to use one of the new instruction sets (AVX maybe? or other never CPU features which old Phenom series lacking ) without proper verification of their availability causing errors on older CPUs.

It would be nice if someone from the owners of the old processors (like a Phenom or Core 2 DUO/QUAD) check this.
ID: 109245 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6

Message boards : Number crunching : Rosetta Beta 6.00



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org