Message boards : Number crunching : Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
Previous · 1 . . . 126 · 127 · 128 · 129 · 130 · 131 · 132 . . . 300 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1673 Credit: 17,593,339 RAC: 22,296 |
Just checked my Tasks and a few from the 29th have come through, but the number of Pendings is still almost triple the number of Valids. Hopefully the life signs will continue to improve as the day goes on. Grant Darwin NT |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2117 Credit: 41,139,251 RAC: 16,277 |
Just checked my Tasks and a few from the 29th have come through, but the number of Pendings is still almost triple the number of Valids. Yeah, another look and I'm not buying my idea either tbh. Updated to 243k backlog - higher still, not lower. A watched pot never boils - I'll look again tomorrow |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1673 Credit: 17,593,339 RAC: 22,296 |
Luckily the Rosetta graphs also show the Validation numbers. It looks like the Validators have been having issues for a while now. Generally they've been averaging a backlog of around 600 or so. But since Wednesday of last week, there have been periods where they've been falling behind, then catching up. The amount they fall behind each time getting larger until they came good for a couple of days from late Sunday. Then they stared falling behind again, more and more each time until the present huge backlog. Compare that to over the last year. Grant Darwin NT |
robertmiles Send message Joined: 16 Jun 08 Posts: 1232 Credit: 14,269,631 RAC: 2,588 |
A task running MUCH longer than the expected 8 hours: Now aborted after 3 days and 20 hours elapsed, less than 10 minutes CPU time. The python tasks need a major improvement in how they detect tasks taking too long to run, Could the current validator be written in Python, and having this same problem? |
robertmiles Send message Joined: 16 Jun 08 Posts: 1232 Credit: 14,269,631 RAC: 2,588 |
Rosetta@Home has a problem with how you recover after losing your password. The line where it asks you to enter your email address will not allow you to enter anything unless toy first click in the right half of the line and make the box appear that you need to put the email address inside. |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2117 Credit: 41,139,251 RAC: 16,277 |
Just checked my Tasks and a few from the 29th have come through, but the number of Pendings is still almost triple the number of Valids. Not getting any better - in fact much worse. I've sent another nudge with a request for a timescale. Combined with my entire email provider being down for 3 consecutive days, this is not what I want to see... |
TSD Send message Joined: 10 Oct 08 Posts: 7 Credit: 2,189,714 RAC: 0 |
As usual there is no information about what is happening. I don't know what I am doing here. I'm running Folding@Home now. |
sgaboinc Send message Joined: 2 Apr 14 Posts: 282 Credit: 208,966 RAC: 0 |
validator not running? I've a bunch of tasks that has not been validated for a few days https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/server_status.php Workunits waiting for validation 396840 Seem to be increasing. even though the server status page seem to say the validator is running. |
Bryn Mawr Send message Joined: 26 Dec 18 Posts: 389 Credit: 12,070,320 RAC: 8,465 |
As usual there is no information about what is happening. I don't know what I am doing here. Given that it’s now Sunday evening and the people who fix it work a normal working week I am not surprised that they are not posting updates every five minutes. Are you so desperate for credits that a problem that does not stop you from processing, just delays the credits from going to your account, sends you running to another project? Sorry, I just don’t see the emergency. |
TSD Send message Joined: 10 Oct 08 Posts: 7 Credit: 2,189,714 RAC: 0 |
Given that it’s now Sunday evening and the people who fix it work a normal working week I am not surprised that they are not posting updates every five minutes. I would be happy if there were updates every five weeks. Are you so desperate for credits that a problem that does not stop you from processing, just delays the credits from going to your account, sends you running to another project? I don't care about credits. Credits means nothing. Credits is just a digit on my screen. |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2117 Credit: 41,139,251 RAC: 16,277 |
As usual there is no information about what is happening. I don't know what I am doing here. Presumably, if you aren't interested in credits, you're downloading, running and returning tasks without any restriction and everything's great. Lots of articles get posted here on everything the project's doing when they issue papers about them. I don't think they've ever been doing as much work as they currently are. |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 1 Dec 05 Posts: 1994 Credit: 9,523,781 RAC: 8,309 |
I am not surprised that they are not posting updates every five minutes. I would be happy if there were updates every five months |
Bryn Mawr Send message Joined: 26 Dec 18 Posts: 389 Credit: 12,070,320 RAC: 8,465 |
Given that it’s now Sunday evening and the people who fix it work a normal working week I am not surprised that they are not posting updates every five minutes. Then why move to another project just because your credits are delayed? I seriously do not understand the reasoning. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1673 Credit: 17,593,339 RAC: 22,296 |
Well, for a while there the Validation backlog started to reduce (slowly, but it was reducing), but now it's back on it's way up again. Grant Darwin NT |
Bryn Mawr Send message Joined: 26 Dec 18 Posts: 389 Credit: 12,070,320 RAC: 8,465 |
I’m surprised that the drop is so small - my backlog has halved and tomorrow’s credits are looking good :-) |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1673 Credit: 17,593,339 RAC: 22,296 |
I’m surprised that the drop is so small - my backlog has halved and tomorrow’s credits are looking good :-)It looks like just after my last post that they got the Validators working again. The backlog is now half of what is was, so with a bit of luck things should be back to normal in about another 3-4 hours or so. Latest graph. Grant Darwin NT |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1673 Credit: 17,593,339 RAC: 22,296 |
And the backlog has cleared. Grant Darwin NT |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1673 Credit: 17,593,339 RAC: 22,296 |
That's what we like to see. Grant Darwin NT |
Paddles Send message Joined: 15 Mar 15 Posts: 11 Credit: 5,337,832 RAC: 2,700 |
A task running MUCH longer than the expected 8 hours: Reassuring it's not just me. I've had a couple of the vbox tasks do that. I just aborted a task that had been running for 2d 12 hours elapsed, but only about 5 minutes of CPU. Supposedly was 99.8% complete but I think it was "99.6% complete" a day ago, and has gone a past deadline. (https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=1443593989 In this situation, is aborting it the most useful thing to do? I'm not really worried about credits or losing them - just want the CPU time to be doing something useful. Is letting it go on long past deadline still useful to someone, or should I manually abort tasks that seem to be wandering aimlessly so that the processing slot can go to another task? |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1673 Credit: 17,593,339 RAC: 22,296 |
In this situation, is aborting it the most useful thing to do?IMHO- yep. For normal Rosetta tasks the default Target CPU time is 8 hours. There is a watchdog timer that kicks in after 10 hours if it's not completed within that initial 8 hours- so 18hrs all up. From the few Python results i've seen they generally run for less than 8 hours anyway. So if it's not done after a couple of days, i'd abort it- or possibly exit BOINC & restart & see if it then finishes off by itself within a few minutes of restarting. If not, then abort. Grant Darwin NT |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org