If only there was a way to disable beta.

Are you the one that makes graphs of task availability? Are they available for all projects? I was looking for Denis.

Nevermind, found it:
https://grafana.kiska.pw/d/boinc/boinc

That site was flagged by McAffee as "suspicious and risky."

Nevermind, found it:
https://grafana.kiska.pw/d/boinc/boinc

That site was flagged by McAffee as "suspicious and risky."

AVG doesn't. And a site can't be risky unless you download some programs from it. It's just graphs.

And https://www.urlvoid.com/scan/grafana.kiska.pw/ says 0 out of 41 testers found it dodgy. It seems your McAfee is broken. McAfee is infamous for being crap.

McAfee came with my computer parts. I haven't renewed it.

I use Malwarebytes Premium. Supposed to have web, malware, ransomware and exploitation protection.

McAfee came with my computer parts. I haven't renewed it.

I use Malwarebytes Premium. Supposed to have web, malware, ransomware and exploitation protection.

I don't bother with all that. Just a simple antivirus like AVG does me. A website isn't dangerous. You have to run a program on your computer, the AV stops that.

McAfee came with my computer parts. I haven't renewed it.

I use Malwarebytes Premium. Supposed to have web, malware, ransomware and exploitation protection.

If you don't renew it, it's completely worthless, just slowing down everything, so uninstall it. And of course you should never have more than one antivirus installed at once, that's like asking for unnecessary problems and performance issues, so if you want to stay with Malwarebytes, than uninstall McAffe.

But actually all you need today is Windows Defender, it's free and not as annoying as that McAfee crap and most other AV-suites with all their false positives, completely unnecessary features and extreme system load. AVG was good, 10+ years ago, wouldn't recommend it today anymore and I also wouldn't pay anything for AV today when a good one comes for free with Windows.

---

.

But actually all you need today is Windows Defender, it's free and not as annoying as that McAfee crap and most other AV-suites with all their false positives, completely unnecessary features and extreme system load. AVG was good, 10+ years ago, wouldn't recommend it today anymore and I also wouldn't pay anything for AV today when a good one comes for free with Windows.

I tried defender, but it's very difficult to give it an exception, especially when that exception is a pirate windows adjuster. 10 Windows licenses to run Boinc? Forget it.

Haven't been here for a while.
Just tried to read this thread, but stopped after a while.

Seems like a lot of users (actuall just one) are having a great time here!

But I would suggest to do more crunching and less posting.

Guys and Gals: Just relax.

Cheers to all ...

Haven't been here for a while.
Just tried to read this thread, but stopped after a while.

Seems like a lot of users (actuall just one) are having a great time here!

But I would suggest to do more crunching and less posting.

Guys and Gals: Just relax.

Cheers to all ...

My computers do the crunching, leaving me free to piss people off.

Nevermind, found it:
https://grafana.kiska.pw/d/boinc/boinc

That site was flagged by McAffee as "suspicious and risky."

AVG doesn't. And a site can't be risky unless you download some programs from it. It's just graphs.

And https://www.urlvoid.com/scan/grafana.kiska.pw/ says 0 out of 41 testers found it dodgy. It seems your McAfee is broken. McAfee is infamous for being crap.

That's a new site to me - thanks.
No flags from Norton either and nothing suspicious-looking either.
Looks like a false-positive from McAfee, which I also have a low opinion of

---

A few RB tasks available right now fwiw

---

When will rosetta beta stop being beta and replace rosetta 4.20?

When will rosetta beta stop being beta and replace rosetta 4.20?

How long is a piece of string . . . . . .

Usual angle error...

(0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)</message>
<stderr_txt>
[ ERROR ]: Caught exception:

File: C:cygwin64homeboinc4.17Rosettamainsourcesrccore/pack/dunbrack/SingleResidueDunbrackLibrary.hh:306
chi angle must be between -180 and 180: -nan(ind)
------------------------ Begin developer's backtrace -------------------------
BACKTRACE:
------------------------- End developer's backtrace --------------------------

AN INTERNAL ERROR HAS OCCURED. PLEASE SEE THE CONTENTS OF ROSETTA_CRASH.log FOR DETAILS.

---

Haven't been here for a while.
Just tried to read this thread, but stopped after a while.

Seems like a lot of users (actuall just one) are having a great time here!

But I would suggest to do more crunching and less posting.

Guys and Gals: Just relax.

Cheers to all ...

My computers do the crunching, leaving me free to piss people off.

And you seem to excel at that. :>))

When will rosetta beta stop being beta and replace rosetta 4.20?

And where did version 5 go?

When will rosetta beta stop being beta and replace rosetta 4.20?

How long is a piece of string . . . . . .

That can be quantified easily using a tapemeasure and is therefore a monumentally stupid phrase. Maybe if it was a piece of string travelling at the speed of light....

Usual angle error...

(0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)</message>
<stderr_txt>
[ ERROR ]: Caught exception:

File: C:cygwin64homeboinc4.17Rosettamainsourcesrccore/pack/dunbrack/SingleResidueDunbrackLibrary.hh:306
chi angle must be between -180 and 180: -nan(ind)
------------------------ Begin developer's backtrace -------------------------
BACKTRACE:
------------------------- End developer's backtrace --------------------------

AN INTERNAL ERROR HAS OCCURED. PLEASE SEE THE CONTENTS OF ROSETTA_CRASH.log FOR DETAILS.

Rosetta has discovered a new dimension. Let's call it "twist".

My computers do the crunching, leaving me free to piss people off.

And you seem to excel at that. :>))

They deserve to be pissed off. I do delight in correcting the gullible.

When will rosetta beta stop being beta and replace rosetta 4.20?

And where did version 5 go?

The same place as windows 9 . . . . . . . .

String is either a theory , so therefore not a definitive thing that can be measured accurately
Or can be used as in "The Goodies" episode for replacing knee joints , Raymond Baxter seemed ok with it :)

When will rosetta beta stop being beta and replace rosetta 4.20?

And where did version 5 go?

The same place as windows 9 . . . . . . . .

Ah, 9 is "no" in German, 5 is "sank" in French. They don't want to sink.

String is either a theory , so therefore not a definitive thing that can be measured accurately

They must be measuring them by now. What are those boffins at LHC playing at?

Or can be used as in "The Goodies" episode for replacing knee joints, Raymond Baxter seemed ok with it :)

It's my hip I need replacing. Not sure if I want to, sounds nasty, I hate operations.