Message boards : Number crunching : Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
Previous · 1 . . . 53 · 54 · 55 · 56 · 57 · 58 · 59 . . . 300 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,372 RAC: 18,198 |
This is the latest Android version unless I use the BETA. Anyway, I deleted Rosetta from the only phone that can run it. So long, Rosetta. Why are you avoiding the Beta? Betas work just as well as official versions. |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,372 RAC: 18,198 |
Last update broke connectivity with Rosetta@home seems for all my systems. This whole problem was caused by utter incompetance from the Boinc programmers, who should have had that expiry date written down somewhere. They should have changed that certificate long before it expired. If this was a private company, there would be people getting fired right now. |
robertmiles Send message Joined: 16 Jun 08 Posts: 1232 Credit: 14,269,631 RAC: 3,846 |
Last update broke connectivity with Rosetta@home seems for all my systems. It's a known problem with all the BOINC projects that have switched from http: to https: and use a certain expired entry in the ca_bundle.crt file, for Windows and Android users only. The known fix for Windows users is to upgrade to the 7.16.7 version of BOINC, which has the problem entry in ca_bundle.crt removed. A fix for Android users appears to be very difficult to provide. World Community Grid uses https:, but does not use the problem entry, and therefore isn't affected. |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,372 RAC: 18,198 |
Last update broke connectivity with Rosetta@home seems for all my systems. The only projects I know of with the problem are Rosetta, LHC, and Numberfields. LHC and Rosetta (I don't know about Numberfields) have fixed it at their end. You don't need to adjust your own settings any more. My Androids are working on both projects just fine now. |
Erich56 Send message Joined: 11 Jan 16 Posts: 35 Credit: 1,437,503 RAC: 0 |
for a few hours now, my computers have uploaded finished tasks, but according to the BOINC manager they get stuck in the "ready to report" status. |
Erich56 Send message Joined: 11 Jan 16 Posts: 35 Credit: 1,437,503 RAC: 0 |
for a few hours now, my computers have uploaded finished tasks, but according to the BOINC manager they get stuck in the "ready to report" status. the problem seems to have gotten solved now :-) |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,372 RAC: 18,198 |
for a few hours now, my computers have uploaded finished tasks, but according to the BOINC manager they get stuck in the "ready to report" status. Glad to hear it. I saw a server outage today for a few hours, but it seems to be over it. P.S., not being rude, but why do Americans say "gotten"? In the UK, "get" is present tense, "got" is past tense. So is "gotten" like more than 3 days ago or something? Really really past tense? |
Jim1348 Send message Joined: 19 Jan 06 Posts: 881 Credit: 52,257,545 RAC: 0 |
P.S., not being rude, but why do Americans say "gotten"? It is past perfect. We would say "got" or "have gotten", but not "have got". That is considered poor grammar. |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,372 RAC: 18,198 |
P.S., not being rude, but why do Americans say "gotten"? Past what? Er.... I deal with present, past, future. I can't think of any other times. Time is a linear dimension, there's now, before now, and what hasn't happened yet. I've never understood why we don't have a seperate word for future, but two for the past. Seems to have been removed from UK English anyway, although we've kept others. I suppose I should be thankful I don't live somewhere with genders for inanimate objects! |
Jim1348 Send message Joined: 19 Jan 06 Posts: 881 Credit: 52,257,545 RAC: 0 |
Past what? Er.... I deal with present, past, future. I can't think of any other times. American English has evolved in the last 200 years. |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,372 RAC: 18,198 |
Past what? Er.... I deal with present, past, future. I can't think of any other times. Actually it's stayed more the same than UK English. We've had influences from the French for example. Your spelling of sulfur, color, etc, were what we used to use, then the French added extra unnecessary letters and we listened to them. Don't ever join the EU :-) |
Jim1348 Send message Joined: 19 Jan 06 Posts: 881 Credit: 52,257,545 RAC: 0 |
Don't ever join the EU :-) OK, I guess we will scrap our plans to do so. (I know, they wouldn't want us anyway.) |
mikey Send message Joined: 5 Jan 06 Posts: 1895 Credit: 9,118,186 RAC: 6,004 |
for a few hours now, my computers have uploaded finished tasks, but according to the BOINC manager they get stuck in the "ready to report" status. "It has gotten dark outside"!!! To say "it has got dark outside'' is just plain bad in any language. |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,372 RAC: 18,198 |
for a few hours now, my computers have uploaded finished tasks, but according to the BOINC manager they get stuck in the "ready to report" status. Well that's what we say in the UK, since we don't use the word gotten anymore. And I can't understand why you need it. Got is past tense, for anything that happened in the past. It became dark earlier than now, so you use got. Officially, "past perfect" (which I think is pointless, and I assume is what you're saying "gotten" is) refers to to a time before the time you are talking about in the past, so it's in the past of the past, as in "yesterday it had already been raining". But "it has got dark outside" is just past. Anyway, these rules are so complicated that nobody could possibly work out which to use in the time taken to say a sentence in everyday conversation, which is why we've lost that word from UK English. And don't get me wrong, I'm not saying our English is better, for example we spell colour with that pointless extra U, just because the French do. As for manoeuvre vs. maneuver..... 3 vowels together?! I've never learned how to spell that and have to guess until it's close enough for my spellchecker to understand it. |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,372 RAC: 18,198 |
Don't ever join the EU :-) I hope they don't want us back. If Scotland ever get independance, they're going to try to rejoin. Utterly crazy, wanting to leave the UK then join the EU. Independant or not, pick one Miss Sturgeon! |
mikey Send message Joined: 5 Jan 06 Posts: 1895 Credit: 9,118,186 RAC: 6,004 |
for a few hours now, my computers have uploaded finished tasks, but according to the BOINC manager they get stuck in the "ready to report" status. You say ALOT of things differently in the UK that people in the rest of the World do, it's part of what makes each place the same but different, ie Loo, aluminium, tomato, potato and about a million others. You guys also have shaggy cows while the US has longhorn cattle, you guys also eat ALOT of sheep while in the US that's not nearly as popular. The key is we all crunch no matter how we say it. |
Jim1348 Send message Joined: 19 Jan 06 Posts: 881 Credit: 52,257,545 RAC: 0 |
The key is we all crunch no matter how we say it. That is what attracted me to engineering back in a more turbulent era (even more turbulent than now, for people who were not around at the time). It is not political. They are just trying to do useful things. |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,372 RAC: 18,198 |
You say ALOT of things differently in the UK that people in the rest of the World do, it's part of what makes each place the same but different, ie Loo, aluminium, tomato, potato and about a million others. You guys also have shaggy cows while the US has longhorn cattle, you guys also eat ALOT of sheep while in the US that's not nearly as popular. No *you* say a lot different, the language is called English, not American :-P |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,372 RAC: 18,198 |
The key is we all crunch no matter how we say it. And then governments and big business try to steal your ideas and profit from them. All science should be shared for free. |
Jim1348 Send message Joined: 19 Jan 06 Posts: 881 Credit: 52,257,545 RAC: 0 |
And then governments and big business try to steal your ideas and profit from them. All science should be shared for free. No, they never get used unless someone makes them. And it is not stealing when you are paid to invent them, or give them away for free, as with DC projects. In fact, the only reason any of us do these projects is in the hopes that they will get used. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org