Message boards : Number crunching : Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
Previous · 1 . . . 54 · 55 · 56 · 57 · 58 · 59 · 60 . . . 300 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,372 RAC: 18,198 |
And then governments and big business try to steal your ideas and profit from them. All science should be shared for free. Not sure what you mean. But if you work hard at something, then it gets patented, then that idea is not used as well as it could have been. If it's public domain, it will be put to far more use. |
Jim1348 Send message Joined: 19 Jan 06 Posts: 881 Credit: 52,257,545 RAC: 0 |
If it's public domain, it will be put to far more use. About the only places I know where you can test out your theory are North Korea, Cuba and Venezuela. Let us know how you make out. (If the Moderator wants to delete all of this, I won't object.) |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,372 RAC: 18,198 |
If it's public domain, it will be put to far more use. I was under the impression that the results from Rosetta became public domain. See, it can be done, even in our backwards countries. |
Jim1348 Send message Joined: 19 Jan 06 Posts: 881 Credit: 52,257,545 RAC: 0 |
Certainly our results are given away. Companies are then free to do with it what they want. That may include patenting their various contributions; we don't control that. |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,372 RAC: 18,198 |
Certainly our results are given away. Companies are then free to do with it what they want. I assume there is something in place to stop them patenting our part? Science would go so much faster if everybody knew everything instead of every company hiding things. Knowledge should never ever be owned. |
Jim1348 Send message Joined: 19 Jan 06 Posts: 881 Credit: 52,257,545 RAC: 0 |
I assume there is something in place to stop them patenting our part? They can't patent "our part". That is part of the "prior art" to them. They can only patent their advances beyond that, which may of course depend on "our part"; otherwise, there would be no point in doing what we are doing. Otherwise, you "much faster" theory can be put to the test as I have indicated. Good luck. |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,372 RAC: 18,198 |
I assume there is something in place to stop them patenting our part? Are you suggesting that private companies somehow help science? Sure, they have money, but if nobody else can benefit from the findings I call that a backwards step, especially if the patent then ends up blocking anyone else doing similar research. Just look at the nonsense with patenting genes! And those other countries aren't exactly rich enough to try my "idea", which I would prefer to be referred to as "common sense". |
robertmiles Send message Joined: 16 Jun 08 Posts: 1232 Credit: 14,269,631 RAC: 3,846 |
I assume there is something in place to stop them patenting our part? Companies help science if they think they can make money doing so, with a few exceptions for those with owners that want to help the public. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1671 Credit: 17,526,840 RAC: 23,319 |
It'd be nice to keep this thread for Problems and Technical Issues, maybe if you start a thread in the café to discuss this particular subject? Grant Darwin NT |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,372 RAC: 18,198 |
Companies help science if they think they can make money doing so, I guess that could work both ways. More money input, but the possibility of preventing others from using the results. with a few exceptions for those with owners that want to help the public. Elon Musk springs to mind. |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,372 RAC: 18,198 |
It'd be nice to keep this thread for Problems and Technical Issues, maybe if you start a thread in the café to discuss this particular subject? Yawn.... move it then. |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Yawn.... move it then. Please heed the advice to carry on the conversation where more appropriate. All of it is off topic, and it is easier to delete than to move. Far better for all to simply do more than yawn in the first place. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,372 RAC: 18,198 |
Yawn.... move it then. Feel free to delete it. Conversations drift, we've all read it, it can go if you wish. But starting a new conversation would have snapped it in two. |
mikey Send message Joined: 5 Jan 06 Posts: 1895 Credit: 9,118,186 RAC: 6,004 |
12345678910 |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,372 RAC: 18,198 |
12345678910 You've been warned, counting is off topic. |
Walt V Send message Joined: 11 Nov 05 Posts: 1 Credit: 270,174 RAC: 0 |
After resetting the project to the new https address, I keep getting the below error: 6/17/2020 2:32:34 PM | https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/ | Resetting project 6/17/2020 2:32:37 PM | https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/ | Fetching scheduler list 6/17/2020 2:32:39 PM | | Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 6/17/2020 2:32:41 PM | | Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down. According to the server stat page, everything appears to be running. Any clues? |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1671 Credit: 17,526,840 RAC: 23,319 |
After resetting the project to the new https address, I keep getting the below error:If thigs are still not working, might as well start with the basics- re-boot your modem & the computer and see if that clears the networking issue. Grant Darwin NT |
robertmiles Send message Joined: 16 Jun 08 Posts: 1232 Credit: 14,269,631 RAC: 3,846 |
After resetting the project to the new https address, I keep getting the below error: Which version of BOINC are you using? Under which version of which operating system? (For example, I am using 64-bit BOINC 7.16.7 under Windows 10, version 1903.) Your problem looks typical for most users using a recent version of Windows who are still using BOINC 7.16.6 or earlier. https://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx?lang=en-us It appears that you are still using BOINC 7.6.22, although under Windows 10, and therefore need to upgrade to BOINC 7.16.7, preferably with no tasks under BOINC that have started running but have not finished. |
robertmiles Send message Joined: 16 Jun 08 Posts: 1232 Credit: 14,269,631 RAC: 3,846 |
Excuse me - I gave the wrong link for updating your BOINC version. https://boinc.berkeley.edu/download_all.php |
Silverfox505 Send message Joined: 9 May 20 Posts: 1 Credit: 67,437 RAC: 0 |
I'm running Rosetta on a MacBook Air version 10.15.5 with 8 Gb of RAM. BOINC version is 7.16.6 and when I check for a new version it says there are no newer versions. I'm running Rosetta 19 hours/day using at most 32% of CPU time. (so to not let the CPU run too hot) I have been running it for a little over a month and I have 1,786 credits. My question is why am I getting the following message so frequently in the task status report: "Timed out - no response" Sometimes I get also the following: "Not started by deadline - canceled" Thanks in advance for any response(s). |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org