I know that the subject of setting 'Target CPU Run Time' has been beaten to death, but I have never found an answer to this question: If I increase my CPU run time, does that give better science to R@H? If I increase this from its current 8 hours up to the max, am I doing good? ...or does it not make that much difference in the results I send to R@H?

More time yields more completed models that use a given level of science. So you don't crunch a given model any longer, or with any different logic. You just crunch more of them per downloaded task.

Longer runtimes are a good way to reduce the load on the servers, and your download bandwidth, if your usage patterns make longer runtimes easy for you.

---

Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense